Description
Geometry | Cross-section: | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Material: | C35/45 Identical reinforcement pattern Any SLS checks in this material have been turned off |
|
Internal forces | ![]() ULS FC is neglected |
|
Fire conditions | 90min of ISO 834 fire | |
Standard | EN 1992-1-2 [- -] |
Independent reference results
Diamonds results and comparison
Longitudinal reinforcement calculated by Diamonds (EN 1992-1-2 [- -])
Diamonds never shows reinforcement amounts twice. If he shows 4 times 949mm², you should add 949mm² on each side of the column. Not 949mm² divided by 4!
Results | Independent reference | Diamonds | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Longitudinal reinforcement | 949mm² | 949mm² | 0,00% |
References
- EN 1992-1-1: 2005 + AC: 2010
- EN 1992-1-2: 2004/A1:2019
- Van Hooymissen, L., Spegelaere, M., Van Gysel, A., & De Vylder, W. (2002). Gewapend beton. Academia Press
Keep in mind that the calculations in this book are made done using the NBN B15-002/ ENV 1992-1. Both old standards. However, this book still remains a good reference if you want to understand how reinforcement calculations work.
- Tested in Diamonds 2025.