1. Home
  2. Diamonds
  3. Validation
  4. Design
  5. DC EC 13: longitudinal reinforcement in column under pure compression (ULS FI design)

DC EC 13: longitudinal reinforcement in column under pure compression (ULS FI design)

Description

Geometry Cross-section: b=h=250mm
Material: C35/45
Identical reinforcement pattern
Any SLS checks in this material have been turned off
Internal forces N_{Ed.ULS FI}=1700\text{kN}
ULS FC is neglected
Fire conditions 90min of ISO 834 fire
Standard EN 1992-1-2 [- -]
How to model a column in Diamonds that can be compared with hand calculations
  • In this example we don’t want 2nd order effects. Therefor we deselect everything.
  • According to Eurocode 2, reinforcement is required for the forces in ULS, possibly increased with additional reinforcement to limit the stresses in SLS. It’s unknown in advance whether additional reinforcement will be required for SLS. Since we are only doing a ULS calculation in this example, we turn off the stress limits in SLS in Diamonds (by making a copy of C35/45 and editing the copy).

Independent reference results

Open handcalculations

Thermal results

The procedure to perform a fire design can be found here. This article supposes you know the workflow.
From the thermal analysis , we can reduct the following results:

  • Since this column is subjected to pure compression, symmetry in the reduced cross-section (see later) is important for the calculation of the deformation states. Therefor the mesh in the fire analysis has been set to a smaller value than the default.
  • The area in the concrete cross-section where the temperature exceeds 500°C, doesn’t contribute to the resistance. It is completely neglected, as if it wasn’t there. Resulting in a reduced cross-section. It’s with this reduced cross-section the reinforcement amounts in case of fire are calculated.
    The area of the reduced cross-section can be consulted after running a thermal analysis in Diamonds: A_{c,T}= 32473 mm^2
  • The temperature of the tensile reinforcement equals:

        \[\theta_{s,T}= 579.3^{\circ}C\]

    \theta_{s,T} will be used to reduce the yielding strength of steel.
    The mean temperature of all reinforcement steel equals:

        \[\theta_{s,mean}= 579.3^{\circ}C\]

    \theta_{s,mean} will be used to reduce young’s modulus of steel

Using these temperatures we can calculate the reduction on the yielding streng and young’s modulus of steel. The concrete strength is not reduced, because it’s assumed that concrete below 500°C, keeps its full strength.

  • The reduction factor for the yielding strength (EN 1992-1-2 Table 3.2a) becomes k_s = 0.535
  • The reduction factor for the young’s modulus (EN 1992-1-2 Table 3.2a) becomes k_E = 0.371

Reinforcement calculation

The design concrete strength in case of fire:

    \[f_{cd.T}= \frac{f_{ck}}{\gamma_{c.T}}= \frac{35 \text{MPa}}{1}=35 \text{MPa} \]

The reduced young’s modulus equals:

    \[E_{s.T}=k_E \cdot E_s = 0.371 \cdot 200000 \text{MPa}=74180\text{MPa}\]

The reduced yielding strength equals:

    \begin{align*} f_{yd.T} &=min \left(k_s \cdot \frac{f_{yk}}{\gamma_{s.T}}, \varepsilon \cdot E_{s.T} \right) \\ &=min \left(0.535 \cdot \frac{500\text{MPa}}{1}, 0.002 \cdot 74180\text{MPa} \right)\\ &=min \left(267.6\text{MPa}, 148.4\text{MPa} \right)\\ &=148.4\text{MPa}\\ \end{align*}

The longitudinal reinforcement due to compression is calculated using the formula (see DC EC 03):

    \begin{align*} A_s &=\frac{N_{Ed,ULS} -A_{c.T} \cdot f_{cd.T}}{f_{yd.T}}\\ &=\frac{1700 \text{kN} -32473 mm^2 \cdot    35 \text{MPa} }{148.4\text{MPa}}\\ &=3798mm^2\\ \end{align*}

Divide reinforcement over 4 sides:

    \[A_{s, on each side}=\frac{3798mm^2}{4}=949mm^2\]

Diamonds results and comparison

Longitudinal reinforcement calculated by Diamonds (EN 1992-1-2 [- -])
Diamonds never shows reinforcement amounts twice. If he shows 4 times 949mm², you should add 949mm² on each side of the column. Not 949mm² divided by 4!

Results Independent reference Diamonds Difference
Longitudinal reinforcement 949mm² 949mm² 0,00%

References

  • Tested in Diamonds 2025.

Article Attachments

Was this article helpful?

Related Articles

Need Support?
Can't find the answer you're looking for? Don't worry we're here to help!
CONTACT SUPPORT