Description
Material | Doesn’t matter | ||
---|---|---|---|
Geometry | Cross-section | Thickness | ![]() |
Loads | Case 1: | ![]() |
|
Case 2: | ![]() |
||
Case 3: | ![]() |
||
Mesh | Maximum element size: | ![]() |
|
Minimum element size: | ![]() |
Indepent reference results
Diamonds results and comparison
Maxmimum stress at opening for case 3 in Diamonds
Which result | Independent reference | Diamonds | Difference |
---|---|---|---|
Case 1: maximum stress at opening | 0.0300 N/mm² | 0.0294 N/mm² | -2.0% |
Case 2: maximum stress at opening | 0.0450 N/mm² | 0.0454 N/mm² | 0.89% |
Case 3: maximum stress at opening | 0.0600 N/mm² | 0.0615 N/mm² | 2.5% |
References
- Mécaniciens, S. F. D. (1990). Guide de validation des progiciels de calcul des structures: SSLP 02: traction simple d’une plasue perforée
This afnor example served as inspiration for this verficiation example, but the used dimensions where too small to model in Diamonds. - Roark, R. J., & Young, W. C. (2002). Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain (7th edition, Table 17.1 case 6a). McGraw-Hill Companies.
- Tested in Diamonds 2024r01.