1. Home
  2. Diamonds
  3. Validation
  4. Dynamic analysis
  5. Bar structures
  6. DLD 01: Mass-spring system with 2 degrees of freedom – eigen modes & modal information

DLD 01: Mass-spring system with 2 degrees of freedom – eigen modes & modal information

Description

Geometry Mass m_1=50kg
m_2=80kg
Spring contant k_1=4000N/m
k_2=6000N/m
Mesh No. of divisions 1
How to model this mass-spring system in Diamonds?

Diamonds is not intended to model mass-spring systems.  However, with a little out-of-the box thinking, it’s possible to model certain types of mass-spring systems.

  • Diamonds doesn’t contain spring-elements, but they can be modelled using a weightless bar.
    The spring constant k of a bar can be written as: \frac{E \cdot A}{L} (see this article).
    If we choose A=25mm^2 and E=40N/mm^2, we can calculate the bar length L resulting in the spring constant k.

        \[L_1=\frac{E \cdot A}{k}=\frac{40N/mm^2 \cdot 25mm^2}{4000N/m} = 0.25m\]

        \[L_2=\frac{E \cdot A}{k}=\frac{40N/mm^2 \cdot 25mm^2}{6000N/m} = 0.167m\]

    So the spring- elements, can be modelled as a weightless bars with area A, modulus of elasticity E and lengths L_1 and L_2. Let’s name them “spring-bars”.

  • Add a new material to the library. Name it “DLD 01”.
    Set Young’s modulus equal to E=40N/mm^2 and the density \pho=0,001kg/m^3 very small because we want weightless bars. The other mechanical material properties are irrelevant.
  • The masses m [kg] must be modelled as forces F [kN].
    Create a new load group ‘Masses static effect’. The partial safety factors and combination factors are not relevant, but make sure \Psi_2 and \varphi are equal to 1.
  • In this example, the masses are meant to move in the in same direction as the springs compress. This determines the orientation of the model. Let’s assume we model the spring-bars horizontally:
  • Then the forces (representing the masses) must also be modelled horizontally. But this way, they don’t contribute to the modal mass. Only the vertical forces contribute. So the spring-bars and forces must be modelled vertically.
  • Because we want a system with 2 DOF, all displacements en rotations along the weightless bars have been prevented, except for the Y-displacement.
  • Pendulum-like mass-spring systems cannot be modelled. Neither can a damper.

Results

Eigenfrequenties

Eigen mode Independent reference Diamonds Difference
1 0.778Hz 0.778Hz 0,00%
2 2.520Hz 2.520Hz 0.00%

Eigenmodes

Eigen mode Independent reference Diamonds Difference1
1 u1=0,0671
u2=0,0984
u1=67,03
u2=98,38
0,00%
2 u1=0,124
u2=-0,053
u1=124,44
u2=-53,00
0.00%

1. Eigenmodes are determined except for a proportionality factor. In Diamonds, the eigen modes are scaled using the units for displacement. In this example, the unit were set to mm. As the result, the eigen modes in Diamonds are scale so that, \phi^{T} \cdot M \cdot \phi=10^6, while the reference used a scaling so that \phi^{T} \cdot M \cdot \phi=1. If you’d ask the deformations in m instead of mm, you’d see that Diamonds can also use the scale \phi^{T} \cdot M \cdot \phi=..

References

  • Hofman, G. E. (2012). Eindige Elementen Methode: Deel 2. MERc, p118
  • Tested in Diamonds 2024r01.

Was this article helpful?

Related Articles

Need Support?
Can't find the answer you're looking for? Don't worry we're here to help!
CONTACT SUPPORT